Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 5;15(2):R108. doi: 10.1186/cc10129

Table 1.

FFP administered in relation to the three approaches to classifying the circumstances of administrationa

Variable FFP units
(median, first to third quartile)
FFP volume, ml
(median, first to third quartile)
FFP dose, ml kg-1
(median, first to third quartile)
Reason given by clinician at time of FFP transfusion
 Coagulopathy with bleeding (n = 185) 3 (2 to 4) 875 (558 to 1104) 11.1 (7.8 to 15.3)
 Coagulopathy without bleeding (n = 138) 2 (2 to 4) 561 (509 to 854) 8.9 (6.8 to 13.1)
 No bleeding prior to procedure (n = 59) 2 (2 to 4) 560 (528 to 1017) 9.8 (6.9 to 13.0)
P value for differences across groups <0.0001 <0.0001 0.009
 All (N = 404) 3 (2 to 4) 736 (536 to 1092) 10.2 (7.0 to 14.1)
Clinically significant haemorrhage recorded on day of transfusion
 No (n = 215) 2 (2 to 4) 561 (517 to 1017) 9.1 (6.7 to 13.2)
 Yes (n = 189) 3 (2 to 4) 875 (558 to 1100) 11.1 (7.9 to 14.7)
P value for differences across groups <0.0001 <0.0001 0.006
Use of FFP in relation to occurrence of PT prolongation during ICU admission
FFP administered but no PT prolongation occurred at any time during ICU admission (n = 64) 2 (2 to 4) 568 (502 to 936) 8.5 (5.7 to 12.6)
PT prolongation occurred during ICU admission, but FFP administered out with an episode of PT prolongation (n = 63) 2 (2 to 4) 570 (535 to 1077) 8.6 (6.3 to 13.7)
FFP administered during an episode of PT prolongation (n = 277) 3 (2 to 4) 806 (542 to 1092) 10.8 (7.3 to 14.4)
P value for differences across groups 0.11 0.037 0.014

aFFP, fresh frozen plasma; PT, prothrombin time; ICU, intensive care unit.