Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 1;21(12):1651–1662. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwr101

Table I.

Observed (Obs.) and calculated (Calc.) three-bond proton–proton vicinal couplings (JH,H, Hz) for the five α-d-monosaccharides in water

Hexosamine Coupling Obs. Calc.
GlcNAc J1,2 3.5 3.2
GlcNAc J2,3 10.7 10.1
GlcNAc J3,4 9.9 9.9
GlcNAc J4,5 9.3 10.0
GlcNAc JHN,H2 8.8 9.7
GlcNAc J5,6proR 5.2a 4.5
GlcNAc J5,6proS 2.3a 3.2
GlcNS J1,2 3.5 2.6
GlcNS J2,3 10.4 10.2
GlcNS J3,4 9.0 9.9
GlcNS J4,5 10.2 10.0
GlcNS6S J1,2 3.5 2.6
GlcNS6S J2,3 10.4 8.8
GlcNS6S J3,4 9.1 9.8
GlcNS6S J4,5 10.1 9.9
GlcNS6S3S J1,2 3.3 2.7
GlcNS6S3S J2,3 10.7 10.2
GlcNS6S3S J3,4 8.9 8.3
GlcNS6S3S J4,5 10.1 10.0
GlcNS3S J1,2 3.3 2.7
GlcNS3S J2,3 10.7 10.2
GlcNS3S J3,4 8.8 9.9
GlcNS3S J4,5 10.1 8.5

The Karplus equations of Hricovini and Bizik, Altona and Haasnoot (1980) and Mobli and Almond (2007) were used for pyranose ring, hydroxymethyl and acetamido vicinal couplings, respectively. Experimental errors were estimated to be ±0.2 Hz and standard deviations of calculated ring vicinal couplings were estimated to be at most 0.01 Hz. (except GlcNAc J5,6proR which was ±0.1 Hz).

aData from a previous NMR study (Blundell et al. 2009).