Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 21;1:27. doi: 10.1186/2043-9113-1-27

Table 2.

Top Scorer Clusters

Time Point (day p.i.)
Topological Metric 1(day p.i.) 2(day p.i.) 3(day p.i.) 4(day p.i.) 5(day p.i.)
Rank 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

Hubba MNC 17 18 24 15 0 17 18 15 24 25 17 25 15 18 24 17 25 15 24 18 25 24 15 17 18
Hubba EPC 17 18 24 15 20 17 24 15 18 25 17 25 15 24 18 17 25 15 24 18 25 15 24 18 17

Hubba DMNC 0 10 4 6 7 11 14 20 32 0 2 11 12 22 31 31 0 4 10 7 0 11 22 28 31
Hubba Degree 17 18 24 15 0 17 18 15 24 25 17 15 25 18 24 17 25 15 18 24 25 24 15 18 17

Hubba BN 17 18 15 - - 17 15 - - - 18 17 15 24 - 17 18 15 24 - 18 24 15 17 20
Indegree 10 11 7 9 22 11 14 9 32 17 10 11 32 8 9 10 11 24 23 32 10 11 14 23 9

Outdegree 17 18 24 15 3 17 18 15 24 25 17 15 25 18 24 17 25 15 24 18 25 15 24 18 17
Betweenness Centrality 17 18 15 24 33 17 18 15 20 25 17 18 29 15 25 17 25 18 23 15 18 17 25 15 23

Clusters were evaluated in every time point with several topological metrics as defined in Hubba analyzer. Also, the indegree, outdegree and betweenness centrality scores were calculated with the use of Cytoscape plugins. We display the top 5 clusters (with descending rank order) at every time point with the highest scores in every metric, with the exception of BN metric where only few clusters had score > 0.