Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 26;7:161–166. doi: 10.2174/1745017901107010161

Table 1.

Comparison of the Present Study, Canty-Mitchell, and Zimet

Item no. FR FA SO
Present Study Canty-Mitchell and Zimet’s Present Study Canty-Mitchell and Zimet’s Present study Canty-Mitchell and Zimet’s
7 .91(.86) § .75
6 .89(.77) .66
9 .80(.75) .83
12 .77(.70) .90
4 .82(.86) .80
11 .80(.82) .89
3 .73(.71) .84
8 .70(.65) .77
5 .83(.78) .85
10 .80(.64) .78
2 .78(.61) .92
1 .71(.54) .67
Eigenvalues 5.89(4.94) - 1.66(1.75) - 1.22(1.21) -
% variances 49.11(41.20) - 13.86(14.59) - 10.16(10.11) -
Mean (±SD) 5.56±1.07 (4.52±1.22) 5.42±1.42 6.25±0.91 (5.79±1.36) 5.33±1.48 5.57±1.06 (4.67±1.63) 5.90±1.30
Cronbach’s alpha 0.91(0.84) 0.89 0.83(0.85) 0.91 0.86(0.74) 0.91

Note:

n= 310 for student sample, n = 152 for patient sample;

n= 222

§

Data in the parenthesis were from patient group