. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 18.

Published in final edited form as: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 May;4(5):481–491. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.12.008

Table 4.

Unadjusted and Adjusted HR of Cardiac CT Features for Predicting MACE

	Model 1		Model 2		Model 3
	HR (95% CI)	p Value	HR (95% CI)	p Value	HR (95% CI)	p Value
CT stenosis
No stenosis	1.00 (reference)	N/A	1.00 (reference)	N/A	1.00 (reference)	N/A
Stenosis	19.84 (7.44–52.89)	<0.0001	21.53 (7.68–60.38)	<0.0001	16.00 (5.92–43.22)	<0.0001

CT stenosis + regional LV function
Stenosis (−), RWMA (−)	1.00 (reference)	N/A	1.00 (reference)	N/A	1.00 (reference)	N/A
Stenosis (−), RWMA (+)	24.23 (4.05–145.06)	0.0005	25.64 (4.25–154.68)	0.0004	21.03 (3.50–126.33)	0.0009
Stenosis (+), RWMA (−)	13.47 (2.47–73.54)	0.003	15.04 (2.67–84.79)	0.002	12.09 (2.20–66.37)	0.004
Stenosis (+), RWMA (+)	124.92 (28.63–545.03)	<0.0001	138.81 (30.74–626.80)	<0.0001	92.49 (20.84–410.54)	<0.0001

Model 1 = unadjusted Cox proportional hazards model; Model 2 = model 1 adjusted for being on any baseline medications; Model 3 = model 1 adjusted for being on any medications at 2-year follow-up.

CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; N/A = not applicable; other abbreviations as in Tables 2 and 3.