Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 14;1(2):e000257. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000257

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of the two study groups

Women who used therapeutic dose of LMWH (N=95) Women who did not use LMWH (N=524)
Age, years median (range) 32 (21–43) 31 (18–44)
Ethnicity N (%)
 Caucasian 67 (70) 264 (50)
 African 14 (15) 167 (32)
 Others/unknown* 14 (15) 93 (18)
Gestational age, weeks median (range) 39 (26–44) 39 (25–43)
Delivery route
 Vaginal N (% of all women) 73 (77) 472 (90)
  Normal delivery (% of vaginal deliveries) 67 (92) 437 (93)
  Assisted delivery (% of vaginal deliveries) 6 (8) 35 (7)
 Caesarean section N (% of all women) 22 (23) 52 (10)
  Primary caesarean section (% of caesarean sections) 11 (50) 5 (10)
  Emergency caesarean section (% of caesarean sections) 11 (50) 47 (90)
Perineal laceration degree N (% of vaginal deliveries)
 1st degree 7 (10) 43 (9)
 2nd degree, episiotomy 12 (16) 59 (12)
 2nd degree, spontaneous rupture 24 (33) 100 (22)
 3rd degree 0 (0) 7 (1)
 No laceration 29 (40) 263 (56)
 Unknown 1 (1)
Birth weight, grams median (range) 3150 (365–4290) 3235 (555–5035)
Indication for LMWH administration N (% of all women)
 History of VTE 15 (16)
 History of VTE and thrombophilia 52 (55)
 Current VTE 11 (12)
 Current VTE and thrombophilia 2 (2)
 Recurrent thrombophlebitis and thrombophilia 1 (1)
 Antiphospholipid syndrome 4 (4)
 Pre-eclampsia 1 (1)
 Prosthetic heart valve 7 (7)
 Prosthetic heart valve + current heart thrombosis 1 (1)
 Current CVA 1 (1)
*

Data on ethnicity for two cases were missing.

VTE during current pregnancy.

CVA, cerebrovascular accident; LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin; VTE, venous thromboembolism.