Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 30;13(2):e43. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1695

Table 2.

Comparison of the participants’ characteristics at baseline between those successfully followed up and those lost during follow-up

Followed up
(n = 403)
Lost to Follow-up
(n = 47)
Test Result P Value
Age t448 = −3.0 .003
Mean (SD) 41.2 (15.0) 34.2 (14.8)
Educationa, n (%) χ²2 = 0.87 .65
Low, n (%) 70 (17.4) 9 (19.1)
Medium, n (%) 116 (28.8) 16 (34.0)
High, n (%) 217 (53.8) 22 (46.8)
Living arrangement χ²1 = 5.29 .02
Living with partner, n (%)b 199 (49.6) 15 (31.9)
Employment status χ²1 = 0.63 .43
Paid employment, n (%)b 229 (57.1) 24 (51.1)
Weekly alcohol intake in standard units t448) = 1.7 .09
Mean (SD)c 30.8 (17.0) 35.2 (17.9)
Frequency of binge drinking t448 = 1.1 .29
Mean (SD)d 2.1 (1.3) 2.3 (1.2)

a Low = elementary or high school, medium = occupational certificate, high = university or college degree

b Includes 2 missing values

c A standard unit of alcohol contains 10 grams of ethanol

d Frequency of binge drinking defined as frequency of consuming more than 5 units of alcohol on at least one single occasion per week