Table 3.
Change in success rates of adherence to the low-risk drinking guideline at the 1-month follow-up
| Experimental Condition | Control Condition | ||||||||||
| n | % Success | n | % Success | OR | 95% CI | NNTa | χ² | P Value | |||
| 1-month follow-up | |||||||||||
| Total sample EMb imputation |
230 | 42.2 | 220 | 30.5 | 1.7 | 1.13-2.46 | 8.6 | χ²1 = 6.7 | .01 |
||
| Completers-only | 207 | 41.5 | 195 | 29.2 | 1.7 | 1.14-2.60 | 8.1 | χ²1 = 6.6 | .01 | ||
| Total sample LOCFc imputation |
230 | 37.4 | 220 | 25.9 | 1.7 | 1.14-2.56 | 8.7 | χ²1 = 6.8 | .01 | ||
| 6-month follow-up | |||||||||||
| Total sample EMb imputation |
230 | 45.7 | 220 | 37.3 | 1.4 | 0.97-2.06 | 11.9 | χ²1 = 3.3 | .07 |
||
| Completers-only | 195 | 44.1 | 188 | 36.7 | 1.3 | 0.90-2.05 | 13.5 | χ²1 = 2.2 | .14 | ||
| Total sample LOCFc imputation |
230 | 37.4 | 220 | 31.4 | 1.3 | 0.88-1.93 | 16.7 | χ²1 = 1.8 | .18 | ||
a NNT = numbers needed to treat
b EM imputation = imputation based on the expectation-maximization algorithm
c LOCF imputation = imputation based on last observation carried forward