Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 17;29(33):4365–4372. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.3714

Table 3.

Meta-Analysis for Likelihood Ratio Tests for Improved Prognostic Value: Meta-Analysis of Evaluable Patients (n = 1,735)

Comparison Likelihood Ratio df P
RSPC v RS alone 76.9 8 < .001
RSPC v tumor grade, tumor size, and age 45.4 4 < .001

Abbreviations: RS, recurrence score; RSPC, recurrence score– pathology–clinical.