. 2011 Nov 21;6(11):e26785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026785

Table 2. DIC comparisons among grouping schemes for host plant preferences.

Grouping	DIC
(CP,MR,GV,VE,LS,TC,YG)	137.61
(CP)(MR)(GV)(VE)(LS)(TC)(YG)	−3382.07
(CP,MR)(GV,VE)(LS)(TC)(YG)	−5416.32
(CP,MR)(GV)(VE)(LS)(TC)(YG)	−5530.88
(CP,MR)(GV,VE)(TC)(LS,YG)	−5597.75
(CP,MR)(GV,VE)(LS,TC,YG)	−6085.99

Parenthetical groups constrained to have same preference parameters in the model. DIC values based on 40000 MCMC steps following a burnin of 10000 generations. Abbreviations are as follows: CP, Carson Pass; GV, Gardnerville; LS, Leek Springs; MR, Mt. Rose; TC, Trap Creek; VE, Verdi; YG, Yuba Gap.