Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 21;6(11):e27731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027731

Table 3. Missing branch rates (%) and alignment SP-FN errors of ML methods on alignments the three largest biological datasets.

Missing branch rate (%)
Alignment ML Method 16S.B.ALL 16S.T 16S.3 Average
TrueAln RAxML 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FastTree 3.9 2.8 3.2 3.3
RAxML-Limited 13.8 5.5 6.1 8.4
SATé RAxML n.d. 7.5 6.8 n.a.
FastTree n.d. 8.2 7.7 n.a.
RAxML-Limited n.d. 11.0 8.4 n.a.
MAFFT RAxML n.d. 7.3 n.d. n.a.
FastTree n.d. 8.2 n.d. n.a.
RAxML-Limited n.d. 8.9 n.d. n.a.
PartTree RAxML 31.8 17.1 12.0 20.3
FastTree 29.1 16.3 12.5 19.3
RAxML-Limited 38.4 18.6 15.4 24.1
ClustalW RAxML n.d. 9.7 9.9 n.a.
FastTree n.d. 10.5 10.4 n.a.
RAxML-Limited n.d. 12.9 13.3 n.a.
Quicktree RAxML 13.2 33.9 31.8 26.3
FastTree 13.5 33.9 32.5 26.6
RAxML-Limited 21.8 35.0 35.6 30.8

Only three alignment methods succeeded on the three largest biological datasets. For the other alignments that could not be successfully computed due to excessive memory requirements, topological accuracy of the ML methods were not available and thus not reported. “Average” refers to the average across the datasets. Entries for which no data was available because the alignment method failed to complete are marked “n.d.”. Averages that were not computed due to missing alignments for some datasets are marked “n.a.”. Inline graphic for each reported value other than the average.