Table 2.
Advantages and disadvantages of heparin or citrate anticoagulation during continuous renal replacement therapy
| Heparins | Citrate | |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical | ||
| Anticoagulation | Regional and systemic | Regional, not systemic |
| Risk of bleeding | Higher | Not increased |
| Circuit life | Similar or shorter | Similar or longer |
| Metabolic control | Good | Good if well performed |
| Metabolic derangements | Greater risk if not well controlled | |
| Understanding | Easy | Difficult |
| Life-threatening complications | Massive bleeding | |
| Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (UFH >LMWH) | Cardiac arrest due to unintended rapid infusion | |
| Clinical outcome | Possibly better patient and kidney survival | |
| Biochemical | ||
| Anticoagulation | Critically ill patients exhibit heparin resistance due to: | |
| • Low antithrombin (high consumption and degradation) | ||
| • Acute phase proteins and apoptotic/necrotic cells bind heparin (UFH >LMWH) | ||
| Proinflammatory effects | Inhibit the anti-inflammatory properties of antithrombin (UFH >LMWH) | |
| Trigger antithrombin degradation by elastase | ||
| Release myeloperoxidase, elastase, platelet factor 4, superoxide dismutase into the circulation (UFH, LMWH) | ||
| Increase in lipopolysaccharide-induced, LPB-dependent IL-8 and IL-1β secretion from monocytes (LMWH, UFH) | ||
| Anti-inflammatory effects | Inhibit thrombin generation (UFH, LMWH) | Its use prevents the release of granular products from neutrophils and platelets |
| Block P-selectin and L selectin-mediated cell adhesion (UFH, LMWH) | ||
| Decrease cytokine generation in vitro, not in vivo | ||
| Phagocytosis | Bind to apoptotic and necrotic cells and may delay phagocytic clearance (UFH >LMWH) | |
| Bio-energetic properties | Provides energy without needing insulin for entrance into the cell | |
| May protect against mitochondrial dysfunction |
UFH, unfractionated heparin; LMWH, low molecular weight heparin; LBP, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein.