Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 25;15(1):R38. doi: 10.1186/cc9988

Table 2.

Quality indicators during pre- and post-implementation of consensus pathway for managing pneumonia in the ICU

Quality indicator Number/number evaluable a (%) P-value
Pre-implementation (n = 274) Post-implementation (n = 158)
QI-1: Diagnostic criteria for HAP, VAP or HCAP met 247/257 (96.1) 150/151 (99.3) 0.06
QI-2a: Respiratory sample obtained before antibiotics 253/265 (95.5) 134/141 (95.0) 0.81
QI-2b: Blood culture obtained before antibiotics 214/264 (81.1) 121/141 (85.8) 0.23
QI-3: Empiric therapy compliant with ATS/IDSA guidelines [1]b 79/257 (30.7) 66/151 (43.7) 0.01
QI-4: Short-course therapy performed 5/20 (25.0) 9/17 (52.9) 0.10
QI-5a: De-escalation possible 173/266 (65.0) 96/140 (68.6) 0.47
QI-5b: De-escalation possible and performed 56/173 (32.4) 36/96 (37.5) 0.40
QI-6: Clinical success at day 14 170/250 (68.0) 89/134 (66.4) 0.75

ATS, American Thoracic Society; HAP, hospital-acquired pneumonia; HCAP, healthcare-associated pneumonia; ICU, intensive care unit; IDSA, Infectious Diseases Society of America; VAP, ventilator-associated pneumonia.

a All patients were not evaluable for every quality indicator. b Empiric therapy compliant with center-specific guidelines: pre- vs post-implementation, 92/257 (35.8%) vs 77/151 (51.0%); P = 0.002.