Table 3.
Information quality |
Personalization | Impartiality | Credible design |
Coping | Threat | Corroboration | Trust | Mean | SD | ||
Information quality | 3.95 | 0.64 | |||||||||
Personalization | .43** | 2.72 | 0.90 | ||||||||
Perceived impartiality | .61** | .29** | 3.72 | 0.82 | |||||||
Credible design | .54** | .30** | .28** | 3.41 | 0.84 | ||||||
Coping | .41** | .33** | .30** | .18** | 3.73 | 1.02 | |||||
Threat | .18** | .09* | .10* | .07 | .66** | 3.63 | 1.11 | ||||
Corroboration | .23** | .08 | .17** | .09* | .19** | .57** | 3.44 | 1.76 | |||
Outcomes | |||||||||||
Trust | .39** | .17** | .33** | .19** | .27** | .66** | .71** | 3.68 | 1.58 | ||
Readiness to act | .24** | .17** | .17** | .08 | .29** | .55** | .62** | .63** | 3.30 | 1.88 |
a The range of each scale was the same as the scale points described in the procedure
*P < .05;
**P < .01.