Table 4. Comparison of response to CsA studies.
Auther | Country | N | Age | RA | HR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Published year) | (median) | (%) | (%) | ||
Jonasova (1998)83 | Czech | 17 | 53 | 94 | 82 |
Catalano (2000)84 | Italy | 9 | 63 | 100 | 55 |
Atoyebi (2002)85 | UK | 6 | 70 | 100 | 0 |
Shimamoto(2003)86¶ | Japan | 50 | 55 | 96 | 60 |
Dixit (2005)87 | India | 19 | 48 | 68 | 58 |
Chen (2006)88 | China | 32 | 46 | 78 | 63 |
Ishikawa (2007)89¶ | Japan | 20 | 52 | 85 | 53 |
Responses were defined by IWG ctiteria.