Table 1.
Thickness and cell density of cellulolytic biofilms cultivated with various types of feedstock and microorganisms
No. | Substrate | Culture | Thickness | ρa (cells cm-2) | d (μm) | Microscope | ρv (cells cm-3) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Alfalfa leave | Mixed rumen bacteria | Monolayer | 2.12 × 108 | 0.77 | TEM | 2.74 × 1012 | (Cheng et al. 1984) |
2 | Forage | Fibrobacter succinogenes | Monolayer | 9.68 × 107 | 1.15 | SEM | 8.43 × 1011 | (Weimer et al. 1993) |
3 | Wheat straw | Fibrobacter succinogenes Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens | Monolayer | 6.85 × 107 | 1.36 | SEM | 5.02 × 1011 | (Miron et al. 2001) |
4 | Cellulose | Land fill mixed culture | Monolayer | 2.02 × 107 | 2.51 | Confocal | 8.05 × 1010 | (Burrell et al. 2004) |
5 | Wheat embryo | Agrobacterium tumefaciens | Monolayer | 5.29 × 107 | 1.55 | SEM | 3.41 × 1011 | (Mooney and Goodwin 1991) |
6 | Cellulose | Mixed leachate | Monolayer | 2.53 × 107 | 2.25 | SEM | 1.13 × 1011 | (Song et al. 2005) |
7 | Cellulose | C. obsidiansis | ~ 10 μm | 1.69 × 108 | 1.80 | Confocal | 1.69 × 1011 | This study |