Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct;101(10):1936–1941. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300159

TABLE 3.

Alcohol Ad Exposure on Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority Trains for All Commuters: Boston, 2009

Type of Neighborhood Surrounding Station
Low Minority,a No. High Minority,b No. Low Poverty,c No. High Poverty,d No. Kenmore,e No. Total, No.
Weekday ridership/station, average 4 320 4 958 3 985 4 857 8 025 4 646
Alcohol ads, average 1.52 0.88 1.16 1.27 57 1.73
Gross impressions/df 689 356 445 825 205 588 929 593 457 425 3 185 212
Gross rating pointsg 47.1 30.5 14.1 63.6 31.3 109
a

Population in census tract was < 23% non-White.

b

Population in census tract was ≥ 23% non-White.

c

< 10% of population in census tract was living below federal poverty line.

d

≥ 10% of population in census tract was living below federal poverty line.

e

Kenmore Station was analyzed independently because of its geographic proximity to Fenway Park and neighborhoods with high populations of college students, as well as the presence of a station domination campaign for Coors beer at the time of the study.

f

Calculated by multiplying the no. of transit passengers on a given weekday by average no. of ads.

g

Calculated by dividing gross impressions/D for each study population by the total no. of people in the target audience for that population, then multiplying each quotient by 100.