TABLE 3.
Alcohol Ad Exposure on Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority Trains for All Commuters: Boston, 2009
| Type of Neighborhood Surrounding Station | ||||||
| Low Minority,a No. | High Minority,b No. | Low Poverty,c No. | High Poverty,d No. | Kenmore,e No. | Total, No. | |
| Weekday ridership/station, average | 4 320 | 4 958 | 3 985 | 4 857 | 8 025 | 4 646 |
| Alcohol ads, average | 1.52 | 0.88 | 1.16 | 1.27 | 57 | 1.73 |
| Gross impressions/df | 689 356 | 445 825 | 205 588 | 929 593 | 457 425 | 3 185 212 |
| Gross rating pointsg | 47.1 | 30.5 | 14.1 | 63.6 | 31.3 | 109 |
Population in census tract was < 23% non-White.
Population in census tract was ≥ 23% non-White.
< 10% of population in census tract was living below federal poverty line.
≥ 10% of population in census tract was living below federal poverty line.
Kenmore Station was analyzed independently because of its geographic proximity to Fenway Park and neighborhoods with high populations of college students, as well as the presence of a station domination campaign for Coors beer at the time of the study.
Calculated by multiplying the no. of transit passengers on a given weekday by average no. of ads.
Calculated by dividing gross impressions/D for each study population by the total no. of people in the target audience for that population, then multiplying each quotient by 100.