Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec;101(12):2308–2316. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300298

TABLE 4.

Parameter Estimates From Final Model of Caregiver Self-Reported Health (excellent/very good vs good/fair/poor): National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth, Canada, 1994–2005

b (SE) OR
Baseline effects
Intercept 1.67* (0.09)
Caregiving status
    Caregivers of healthy children (Ref) 0.00 1.00
    Caregivers of children with 1 indicator –0.36* (0.07) 0.69*
    Caregivers of children with 2 indicators –0.56* (0.08) 0.57*
    Caregivers of children with ≥ 3 indicators –1.07* (0.11) 0.34*
Male caregiver –0.40* (0.11) 0.67*
Caregiver age (centered at 35 y) -0.01 (0.01) 0.99
Caregivers’ highest educational attainment
    < high school –0.86* (0.09) 0.42*
    High school graduate (Ref) 0.00 1.00
    Some postsecondary 0.01 (0.08) 1.01
    Postsecondary degree 0.20* (0.08) 1.22*
Income-to-LICO ratioa (centered at 1.0) 0.29* (0.03) 1.34*
Marital statusa
    Single, never married –0.46* (0.09) 0.63*
    Married, including common-law (Ref) 0.00 1.00
    Divorced, separated, widowed –0.16* (0.07) 0.85*
Male child –0.11* (0.06) 0.90*
Child's age, y
    4–6 –0.22* (0.07) 0.80*
    7–9 (Ref) 0.00 1.00
    10–11 0.02 (0.07) 1.02
Child is only childa –0.37* (0.06) 0.69*
Rate of change
Linear –0.18* (0.02) 0.84*
Income-to-LICO ratio (centered at 1.0)ab –0.03* (0.01)
Caregivers of children aged 4–6 y with ≥ 3 indicatorsb –0.14* (0.06)
Random effects
Level 2: between person
    In initial status 3.35* (0.14)
    In linear rate of change 0.06* (0.01)

Note. Note. LICO = low-income cut-off, an indicator of low income based on family size and before-tax percentage of income spent on necessities; OR = odds ratio.

a

Covariate is time-varying; all other covariates are fixed at baseline values.

b

Term has a significant interaction with at least 1 caregiver group.

*

Estimates indicate values that are significantly different (P < .05) from zero.