Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec;101(Suppl 1):S325–S332. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300034

TABLE 2.

Parameter Estimates and Standard Errors for Generalized Linear Mixed Models of the Age–Crime Curve of Individual Involvement in Violence: Pittsburgh Youth Study, Pittsburgh, PA, 1988

Parameter Estimate SE P
Main effects only
Intercept −14.490 1.803 < .001
Age 1.122 .194 < .001
Age2 −.033 .005 < .001
Disadvantaged neighborhood with PH 1.066 .489 .03
Disadvantaged neighborhood without PH .771 .458 .093
Average neighborhood .709 .403 .079
Risk score 1.154 .220 < .001
Race (Black) .517 .258 .046
Any bad friends .568 .224 .012
Any peer delinquency .867 .229 .001
Young female caretaker .465 .244 .057
First-order interactions of age with neighborhood disadvantage
Intercept −11.419 2.207 < .001
Age .965 .206 < .001
Age2 −.035 .005 < .001
Disadvantaged neighborhood with PH −2.965 1.756 .092
Disadvantaged neighborhood without PH −2.640 1.727 .127
Average neighborhood −2.915 1.662 .08
Age × disadvantaged neighborhood with PH .235 .102 .021
Age × disadvantaged neighborhood without PH .201 .101 .046
Age × average neighborhood .213 .098 .03
Risk score 1.154 .220 < .001
Race (Black) .517 .259 .046
Any bad friends .572 .225 .011
Any peer delinquency .868 .229 .001
Young female caretaker .463 .244 .058
Second-order interactions of age2 with neighborhood disadvantage
Intercept −13.164 1.868 < .001
Age 1.173 .197 < .001
Age2 −.041 .006 < .001
Disadvantaged neighborhood with PH −.970 .972 .319
Disadvantaged neighborhood without PH −1.002 .948 .291
Average neighborhood −1.115 .899 .215
Age2 × disadvantaged neighborhood with PH .007 .003 .023
Age2 × disadvantaged neighborhood without PH .006 .003 .043
Age2 × average neighborhood .006 .003 .034
Risk score 1.154 .220 < .001
Race (Black) .516 .258 .046
Any bad friends .572 .225 .011
Any peer delinquency .867 .229 .001
Young female caretaker .463 .244 .058

Note. PH = public housing. Advantaged neighborhoods are the reference category.