Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 23.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2008 Apr 26;43(6):462–468. doi: 10.1007/s00127-008-0350-0

Table 4.

OLS Regression Coefficients for the Association between TRC Variables and Anger (N=4043)

Model 1 2 3 4
Demographics
  Male −.061** −.075*** −.068** −.078***
  Married .013 .013 .009 .008
  Age −.003*** −.004*** −.003*** −.004***
  Education −.005 −.007* −.007* −.008*
  Employed −.002 −.007 −.004 −.006
  Race (omitted = Black)
    White −.137*** −.111** −.131*** −.116**
    Coloured .033 .044 .039 .047
    Indian −.048 −.040 −.040 −.036
Participation in TRC
  Media Exposure .028 .014
  Attended .132*** .122***
  Provided info .226 .235
  Had experience .146 .112
Perceptions of TRC
  Initial perception (omitted = poor)
    Good/excellent −.023 −.036
    Fair .040 .038
    DK/Refused −.112 −.109
  Final perception (omitted = poor)
    Good/excellent −.103 −.105
    Fair −.133* −.129*
    DK/Refused −.066 −.057
  View of Victims (omitted = negative)
    Positive −.051* −.045
    DK/Refused −.044 −.043
  View of Perpetrtors (omitted = negative)
    Positive −.039 −.038
    DK/Refused −.069 −.061
*

p<=.05;

**

p<.01;

***

p<.001