Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Sep 8;152(6):1044–1052.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.05.028

Table 3.

Association between change in retinal thickness measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) at the central subfield and change in visual acuity for eyes with uveitic macular edema (defined as retinal thickness ≥ 260 μm). Comparisons are made for scores documenting the overall trends and improvement.

Change in visual acuity
Overall trenda ≥ 20% reduction < 20% change ≥ 20% increase P-valueb
> 5 letter improvement 25 (83%) 9 (24%) 1 (14%) < 0.001
≤ 5 letter change 3 (10%) 19 (50%) 3 (43%)
> 5 letter decline 2 (7%) 10 (26%) 3 (43%)
> 10 letter improvement 17 (57%) 5 (13%) 0 (0%) < 0.001
≤ 10 letter change 11 (36%) 26 (69%) 4 (57%)
> 10 letter decline 2 (7%) 7 (18%) 3 (43%)
> 15 letter improvement 10 (33%) 3 (8%) 0 (0%) < 0.001
≤ 15 letter change 19 (63%) 31 (82%) 6 (86%)
> 15 letter decline 1 (3%) 4 (10%) 1 (14%)

Improvementa
≥ 20% reduction < 20% reduction P-valuec
> 5 letter improvement 25 (83%) 10 (22%) < 0.001
≤ 5 letter improvement 5 (17%) 35 (78%)
> 10 letter improvement 17 (57%) 5 (11%) < 0.001
≤ 10 letter improvement 13 (43%) 40 (89%)
> 15 letter improvement 10 (33%) 3 (7%) 0.006
≤ 15 letter improvement 20 (67%) 42 (93%)
a

The counts and column percentages are included for each combination.

b

P-values are based upon ordinal regression using generalized estimating equations (GEE) to account for within-person, between-eye correlation.

c

P-values are based upon logistic regression using generalized estimating equations (GEE) to account for within-person, between-eye correlation.