Table 1.
To From |
vACC | vSTR | HPC | MPFC | DLPFC | DMPFC | PCC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
vACC | 1 | 0.094 | -0.044 | 0.035 | -0.006 | 0.058 | -0.039 |
vSTR | 0.094 | 1 | 0.0498 | -0.166 | 0.009 | -0.050 | -0.207 |
HPC | -0.044 | 0.0498 | 1 | -0.034 | 0.337 | 0.194 | 0.202 |
MPFC | 0.035 | -0.166 | -0.034 | 1 | 0.008 | -0.046 | -0.002 |
DLPFC | -0.006 | 0.009 | 0.337 | 0.008 | 1 | 0.607 | 0.253 |
DMPFC | 0.058 | -0.050 | 0.194 | -0.046 | 0.607 | 1 | 0.135 |
PCC | -0.039 | -0.207 | 0.202 | -0.002 | 0.135 | 0 | 1 |
The instantaneous path coefficients estimated by path analysis with 1dSEM are: vACC → vSTR: 0.094; vSTR → HPC: 0.0498; PCC → DLPFC: 0.2535; vACC → PCC: -0.0195; vSTR → PCC: -0.2055. Model specification was based on a one-TR lagged network identified from a VAR(1) model (Fig. 5). The SEM analysis failed to validate the model as an instantaneous network. Although 1dSEMr shows two significant paths (p < 0.05, uncorrected), PCC → DLPFC and vSTR → PCC, the significance is not reliable when correlation coefficients are provided as input in path analysis (see details in the Discussion section).
None declared.