Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 17;29(6):737–741. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0717-9

Table 1.

Patients who underwent APMs between 1987 and 1996

Pt. Agea Sex Indicationb Locationc Outcome (flow rates) Action Timed Follow-upe
1 13.8 M UPJOf suspected OR <10 cm H2O (at 20 ml/min) PPg 13.4 No intervention
2 59.2 F UVJOh suspected OR 25 cm H2O (at 6 ml/min) after infusing 125 ml RC/RIi 6.8 No re-intervention
3 114.2 F Re-UPJO suspected (pain, dilatation, ↓ renal function after previous pyeloplasty) OR <10 cm H2O (at 12 ml/min) None 14.2 No re-intervention
4 165.6 M UVJO suspected Bedside <10 cm H2O (at 20 ml/min) None 16 No intervention
5 22.6 M Re-UVJO suspected after previous re-calibration and re-implantation OR 17 cm H2O (at 5 ml/min): 26 cm H2O (at 10 ml/min) RI 14.5 No re-intervention
6 17.4 F UVJO suspected OR 0 cm H2O (at 10 ml/min): 10 cm H2O (at 20 ml/min) None 9.9 No intervention
7 92.7 M UVJO suspected OR 20 cm H2O (at 10 ml/min) RC/RI 3.5 No re-intervention
8 13.4 M UPJO suspected OR >20 cm H2O (at 10 ml/min) PP 5.7 No re-intervention
9 39 F UPJO suspected OR 0 cm H2O (at 20 ml/min) None 15.8 No intervention
10 19.9 M UVJO suspected OR Failure, pelvis too small RC/RI 8 No re-intervention
11 195 M UPJO suspected OR 0 cm H2O (at 10 ml/min) None 17.5 No intervention
12 102.5 F UVJO suspected OR >40 ml H2O (10 ml/min) RI 9.5 No re-intervention
13 4.2 M UPJO suspected OR <10 cm H2O (at 10 ml/min) None 15.5 No intervention
14 82.2 M Re-UPJO suspected OR 7 cm H2O (at 10 ml/min) None 4.8 No intervention
15 34.1 F Re-UPJO suspected after previous pyeloplasty Bedside 17 cm H2O (at 10 ml/min) Nephrostomy closed 13.8 Needed new JJ-stent later on
16 0.1 M Evaluation after pyeloplasty complicated by urinoma (treated by nephrostomy) Bedside 10 cm H2O (at 10 ml/min); if abdominal pressure rises: 20 cm H2O (at 10 ml/min) Nephrostomy closed 12.5 No intervention

aAge in months, at the time APM was performed

bReason for the APM

cPlace where APM was performed: at OR (operating room) or a bedside test

dDuration of follow-up (peripheral or in our own centre) in years

eWas there a re-intervention or intervention during follow-up?

fUreteropelvic junction obstruction

gPyeloplasty (Anderson-Hynes)

hUreterovesical junction obstruction

i RC re-calibration; RI re-implantation