Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 3;4:230. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-230

Table 9.

Item to outcome analysis for DUNDRUM-1 and DUNDRUM-2 scales

Not admitted Admitted ANOVA, df = 1 X2
df = 4
Item mean S.D. mean S.D. F X2

DUNDRUM-2 triage urgency items

TU1 location 1.1 0.8 2.7 0.9 49.34 41.34

TU2 mental health 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.2 23.14 20.04

TU3 self harm 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.2 2.91 7.91

TU4 humanitarian 0.1 0.4 1.8 1.6 28.64 20.94

TU5 systemic 1.6 1.7 3.5 1.1 31.34 25.64

TU6 legal urgency 0.6 0.5 1.0 1.1 3.61 6.7

DUNDRUM-1 triage security items

TS1 serious violence 1.5 1.1 2.5 1.1 13.24 14.73

TS2 serious self harm 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 0 7.81

TS3 immediacy of violence 1.6 1.0 2.7 1.2 14.94 13.63

TS4 immediacy of self harm 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.4 0.7 7.4

TS5 special forensic need 1.2 0.9 2.2 1.0 15.94 13.53

TS6 absconding 1.6 0.9 2.3 1.0 6.82 10.12

TS7 preventing access 1.9 0.9 2.5 0.8 7.33 7.3

TS8 victim issues 1.7 1.2 2.5 1.0 7.83 14.03

TS9 risk of violence 1.8 1.1 2.6 0.9 12.24 11.52

TS10 institutional behaviour 1.4 0.8 1.9 1.1 3.92 9.11

TS11 legal procedure 1.9 1.5 3.7 0.5 43.94 32.44

.1 p < 0.1; 2 p < 0.05; 3 p < 0.01; 4 p < 0.001.