Table 6. Estimates of XFS/XFG risk from a logistic regression model (multivariate analysis).
| Regression term | OR | 95% CI | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
rs1048661 TT versus TG+GG |
12.13 |
4.11–35.78 |
6.113×10−6 |
|
rs3825942 GG versus GA+AA |
1.13 |
0.23–5.50 |
0.878 |
|
rs2165241 CC versus CT+TT |
2.93 |
0.52–16.38 |
0.222 |
| Age/year |
0.99 |
0.95–1.04 |
0.715 |
| Sex (male versus female) |
0.88 |
0.46–1.66 |
0.685 |
| DM versus no DM |
0.33 |
0.14–0.76 |
0.009 |
| HTN versus no HTN |
1.19 |
0.59–2.42 |
0.623 |
| RVO versus no RVO |
0.20 |
0.02–1.82 |
0.153 |
| CVA+TIA versus no CVA+TIA |
1.38 |
0.37–5.11 |
0.628 |
| IHD versus no IHD | 7.75 | 1.41–42.51 | 0.018 |
XFS, Exfoliation syndrome; XFG, Exfoliation glaucoma; OR, odds ratio; DM, Diabetes mellitus; HTN, Hypertension; RVO, Retinal vein occlusion; CVA, Cerebrovascular accident; TIA, Transient ischemic attack; IHD, Ischemic heart disease.