Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 20.
Published in final edited form as: Nutr Cancer. 2011 Jul 20;63(6):950–959. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2011.590266

TABLE 1.

Urinary 11β-PGF and PGE-M in relation to 1% niacin and HPGDS transgenesa

A. Estimated mean prostaglandin excretion (and 95% confidence intervals; in units of pg/mg of creatinine) among mice on the control diet, mice on 1% niacin, and HPGDS transgenic mice
Controlb 1% Niacin HPGDS transgenicc
11β-PGF 403 (285–571) 385 (230–646) 633 (326–1,228)
No. of urine samples 75 30 35
No. of mice 32 15 9
P-value -- 0.94 0.19
PGE-M 1,995 (1,224–3,251) 2,196 (1,364–3,532) 1,622 (542–4,854)
No. of urine samples 74 30 34
No. of mice 30 15 8
P-value -- 0.92 0.72
B. Relative prostaglandin excretion (and 95% confidence intervals), as compared to control values, in 4 mice that were assessed on both the control diet and the 1% niacin diet
Control 1% Niacin P-value
11β-PGF 1 (0.43–1.47) 1.34 (0.83–1.86) 0.07
No. of urine samples 13 13
No. of mice 4 4
PGE-M 1 (0–2.04) 2.85 (1.80–3.89) 0.02
No. of urine samples 14 12
No. of mice 4 4
a

Data are plotted in Fig. 1. None of the mice represented here had ApcMin alleles.

b

Twenty-seven of the control 11β-PGF measurements (from 19 mice) were previously shown in Park et al. (14), as were 17 of the control PGE-M measurements (from 9 mice).

c

A subset of the data from HPGDS transgenic mice was published in Park et al. (14). However, the results shown here include data from 13 new urine specimens (including 3 specimens from 2 new mice) for 11β-PGF and 5 new urine specimens (including 2 specimens from one new mouse) for PGE-M.