Table 1.
Decile | Estimated population with private health insurance cover in | Quintile | Estimated2 rebate ($m) received by people in | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capital cities | Rest of State | Aust | Capital cities | Rest State | Aust | ||
Highest SES areas | 70.8 | 45.9 | 68.7 | Highest SES areas | 679 | 73 | 749 |
2 | 62.8 | 44.6 | 58.2 | ||||
3 | 55.5 | 45.9 | 52.0 | 2 | 539 | 163 | 701 |
4 | 52.1 | 44.8 | 47.2 | ||||
5 | 48.5 | 40.6 | 44.5 | 3 | 373 | 242 | 615 |
6 | 44.0 | 41.9 | 43.7 | ||||
7 | 42.3 | 41.6 | 41.0 | 4 | 231 | 291 | 525 |
8 | 40.7 | 37.0 | 40.3 | ||||
9 | 36.3 | 38.0 | 36.4 | Lowest SES areas | 177 | 231 | 410 |
Lowest SES areas | 28.5 | 27.3 | 28.1 | ||||
Total | 48.1 | 40.8 | 46.0 | 2000 | 1000 | 3000 | |
Rate ratio3 | 2.48 | 1.68 | 2.45 | 3.84 | 0.32 | 1.83 | |
Lower 95% C.I.4 | 2.47 | 1.68 | 2.44 | 3.35 | 0.25 | 1.55 | |
Upper 95% C.I.4 | 2.49 | 1.69 | 2.46 | 4.40 | 0.40 | 1.88 |
1Based on postcode of address of contributor
2Estimate based on a total rebate amount of $3 billion: allocation to SES areas based on expenditure on private health insurance (incl. accident insurance), by quintiles of socioeconomic status of area, using the ABS Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage, 2001
3Rate ratio is the ratio of value in Highest SES areas to value in Lowest SES areas
4Calculation of 95% confidence intervals (C.I.) based on the comparison of proportions (Berry & Simpson, 1998)
Source: Private health insurance estimates based on data provided by the Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee (see references). Estimated rebate based on expenditure data purchased from ABS from the Household Expenditure Survey 2003–04