Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Graph Model. 2011 Sep 18;31:76–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2011.09.004

Table 5.

Performance of the 10 initially best-ranked and subsequent most accurate pharmacophore models from training set B.

Training Set Metrics Test Set Metrics
# Overlap Accuracy p Hits TP FP Hit rate Recovery
%
Negative
Accuracy
1 2.0221 0.6667 −0.1232 246 71 175 22.4 29.3 49.4
2 1.9688 0.6667 −0.1232 231 63 168 21.4 26.1 51.4
3 1.9603 0.6667 −0.1232 340 95 245 21.8 48.5 29.2
4 1.9518 0.5 0 273 70 203 20.4 32.4 41.3
5 1.9502 0.6667 −0.1232 250 61 189 19.6 28.0 45.4
6 1.9481 0.6667 −0.1232 264 65 199 19.8 30.7 42.5
7 1.9424 0.5 0 256 67 189 20.7 29.9 45.4
8 1.9321 0.6667 −0.1232 288 79 209 21.5 36.6 39.6
9 1.9294 0.6667 −0.1232 300 88 212 22.7 39.6 38.7
10 1.9288 0.5 0 263 72 191 21.5 31.7 44.8
31 1.8731 1 −0.9523 98 29 69 22.8 9.5 80.1