Table 2.
Proportion of children with febrile illness seeking care from different healthcare providers*
Sociodemographic and illness characteristics | Children with fever who sought any care (No.) | Types of healthcare providers | Sought care from >1 provider for febrile illness %(95% CI) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trained % (95% CI) | Untrained % (95% CI) | Traditional % (95% CI) | |||
All children | 1,290 | 59 (55-63) | 35 (32-39) | 6 (4-7) | 2 (2-3) |
Age (years) of children | |||||
<1 | 224 | 64 (57-71) | 25 (19-31) | 11 (7-15) | 3 (1-5) |
1-<2 | 303 | 66 (60-72) | 30 (24-36) | 4 (1-6) | 3 (1-5) |
2-<3 | 239 | 59 (51-66) | 36 (29-44) | 5 (2-8) | 1 (0.1-3) |
3-<4 | 251 | 52 (45-58) | 44 (38-51) | 4 (1-7) | 4 (1-6) |
4-<5 | 273 | 54 (46-61) | 41 (34-48) | 6 (3-8) | 2 (0.2-3) |
Presence of decreased level of consciousness | |||||
Yes | 34 | 85 (73-98) | 9 (-0.01-18) | 6 (2-13) | 12 (0.01-24) |
Sex | |||||
Male | 695 | 62 (58-66) | 33 (29-37) | 5 (3-7) | 3 (2-4) |
Female | 595 | 55 (50-60) | 39 (34-43) | 6 (4-8) | 2 (1-3) |
Education of mothers | |||||
No schooling and some primary | 334 | 44 (37-51) | 51 (45-57) | 5 (3-8) | 3 (1-5) |
Finished primary and some secondary | 493 | 56 (51-61) | 39 (34-43) | 6 (3-8) | 3 (2-5) |
Finished secondary | 459 | 73 (68-77) | 21 (17-25) | 6 (4-9) | 2 (0.3-3) |
Education of fathers | |||||
No schooling and some primary | 249 | 40 (33-48) | 55 (48-63) | 4 (2-7) | 4 (2-7) |
Finished primary and some secondary | 406 | 52 (47-57) | 41 (36-47) | 6 (4-9) | 3 (1-5) |
Finished secondary | 622 | 71 (67-75) | 23 (19-27) | 6 (4-8) | 1 (1-2) |
Socioeconomic status (by quintile) | |||||
First (poorest) | 219 | 35 (26-43) | 59 (51-68) | 6 (2-10) | 4 (1-7) |
Second | 266 | 48 (42-55) | 45 (39-51) | 6 (3-10) | 2 (1-4) |
Third | 247 | 60 (53-66) | 35 (29-41) | 6 (3-9) | 2 (1-4) |
Fourth | 267 | 65 (60-71) | 30 (25-35) | 5 (2-8) | 3 (1-5) |
Fifth (richest) | 223 | 81 (75-86) | 14 (10-19) | 5 (2-8) | 2 (0.1-3) |
* The proportions and 95% confidence intervals have been corrected for the cluster design of the study