Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 1;85(6):1093–1096. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.11-0438

Table 4.

Comparison of mosquito preservation methods

Storage method Comparison to fresh insects* Accuracy of classifying as young (< 7 d) or old (≥ 7 d) (%) Avg. 95% confidence interval (days) Preservation cost per 1.5 mL vial Suitability for field use Health hazards Suitability for DNA extraction‡ Suitability for dissection§
Fresh 88.6 1.14 None Must scan immediately None Good Good
Drierite No significant difference 80.9 1.15 $0.01 Must keep activated Minimal Fair-Good Poor-Good
Silica gel No significant difference 84.1 1.16 $0.01 Must keep activated Minimal Fair-Good Poor-Good
RNAlater No significant difference 77.8 1.33 $1.00 Must keep submerged Minimal Excellent Good
Ethanol Significantly different 73.0 1.36 $0.01 OK Low Fair-Good Poor-Fair
Carnoy Significantly different 80.9 1.29 $0.15 OK Significant Poor Fair
Refrigerated No significant difference 81.5 1.15 $0.01 Must keep cool None Good Good
*

Age predictions from preserved mosquitoes were significantly, or not significantly, different from predictions from fresh insects at P = 0.01.

From 1 to ∼50 mosquitoes can be placed in each vial.

§

As reported by Bisanti and others,11 Quicke and others,12 Nagy,13 and Mandrioli and others.14