Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 24;1(2):e000266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000266

Table 1.

Study characteristics

Study Moustafa et al, 20073 Dogan et al, 20034 Bonacchi et al, 20025 Aris et al, 19996
Methods PRCT PRCT PRCT PRCT
No of participants 30+30=60 20+20=40 40+40=80 20+20=40
Mean age in years (full/mini) 23.8/22.9 64.3/65.7 62.6/64.0 62.2/66.5
Sex M:F (full/mini) 15:15/16:14 11:9/9:11
Operation Isolated AVR Isolated AVR Isolated AVR Isolated AVR
Interventions Full sternotomy vs L-shaped mini-sternotomy Complete sternotomy vs L-shaped mini-sternotomy Standard sternotomy vs C or L-shaped mini-sternotomy Median sternotomy vs C or L-shaped mini-sternotomy
Pain management with tenoxicam Pain management with metamizol
Outcomes Duration of ventilation Duration of ventilation Duration of ventilation Duration of ventilation
Postop blood loss Postop blood loss Postop blood loss Postop blood loss
Length of ICU stay Length of ICU stay Length of ICU stay Length of ICU stay
Pulmonary function Pulmonary function. Pulmonary function Pulmonary function
Analgesic requirement Analgesic requirement
Length of hospital stay Length of hospital stay Length of hospital stay Length of hospital stay
Cross-clamp time Cross-clamp time Cross-clamp time Cross-clamp time
Bypass time Bypass time Bypass time Bypass time
Operation time Operation time Operation time Operation time
Survival to discharge Survival to discharge Survival to discharge Survival to discharge

AVR, aortic valve replacement; ICU, intensive care unit; PRCT, prospective randomised controlled trial.