Skip to main content
. 2011 May 10;258(12):2186–2198. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6088-8

Table 2.

Reaction times and error scores for scanning conditions and the overall Stroop and negative priming effects

ALS Controls Statistic
Control condition RT (ms) 802 (190) 641 (149) Mann-Whitney U = 18.5, Z = −2.277, p = 0.023
Stroop condition RT(ms) 932 (207) 717 (146) Mann-Whitney U = 13.0, Z = −2.70 p = 0.007
Negative priming condition RT (ms) 951 (179) 747 (134) Mann-Whitney U = 10.0, Z = −2.932, p = 0.003
Stroop effect RT (ms) 129 (60) 76 (65) Mann-Whitney U = 27.0, Z = −1.62 p = 0.105
Negative priming effect RT (ms) 20 (53) 29 (53) Mann-Whitney U = 46.0, Z = −0.154 p = 0.877
Stroop RT expressed as percentage of control RT 117 (8) 113 (12) Mann-Whitney U = 40.0, Z = −0.617, p = 0.537
NP RT expressed as percentage of Stroop RT 105 (9) 103 (6) Mann-Whitney U = 45.0, Z = −0.231, p = 0.817
Errors during control condition 0.4 (1.3) 0 (0) Mann-Whitney U = 44.0, Z = −0.816 p = 0.414
Errors during Stroop condition 0.3 (0.6) 0.1 (0.2) Mann-Whitney U = 41.5, Z = −0.720 p = 0.472
Errors during negative priming condition 0.6 (1.6) 0 (0) Mann-Whitney U = 32.0, Z = −1.767 p = 0.077

All values mean (SD)