Skip to main content
. 2006 Nov 27;10(Suppl 3):S8. doi: 10.1186/cc4834

Table 1.

Summary of clinical studies of PAC use

Ref. Year Number of cases Study design Clinical settings Significant findings
[41] 1975 413 Case series Autopsy reports TEV with PAC was 4.25 times more frequent than with central lines; impact on mortality not studied
[38] 1979 116 Prospective case series Critically ill patients with shock, pulmonary edema, and hemodynamic instability postoperatively 77% Arrhythmia without increased mortality or morbidity, 1.7% staphylococcal bacteremia, 1.7% subclavian DVT
[49] 1981 60 Incidence study Critically ill patients 48% PVC and 33% VT with one death
[40] 1981 320 PAC in 219 patients Prospective case series Critically ill patients 3% Major complications; only one death
[36] 1983 528 PAC placements in 500 patients Case series All cases in one medical center 24% Complications, with 4.4% serious ones; no deaths related to complications
[42] 1983 36 Prospective case series Autopsy 61% mural thrombosis; incidence increased with prolonged duration of catheter; no significant impact on clinical course
[46] 1984 55 Case series Autopsy, patients with PAC within 1 month of death 53% RH endocardial lesions, 7% infective endocarditis, with pulmonic valve (56%) and pulmonary artery (5%) being the most and least common sites, respectively
[48] 1985 56 Prospective case series ICU patents with shock, ARDS and preoperative 12.5% advanced ventricular arrhythmia; no treatment required
[37] 1985 141 Case series Autopsy PAC associated with higher rate of mural thrombi compared with central lines
[3] 1987 3263 Retrospective Patients with acute myocardial infarction Increased length of hospital stay associated with PAC use; no long-term benefit
[33] 1988 88 (30/28/30) RCT (PAC control versus supranormal DO2 versus CVP) Preoperative high-risk surgical patients PAC had no effect on outcome unless used to guide therapy
[47] 1989 279 PAC Prospective ICU patients 3% new RBBB
[14] 1989 1094 (537/557) Controlled prospective cohort Elective coronary artery bypass graft No significant difference in outcome between PAC and CVP groups
[4] 1990 5841 Retrospective, analysis of PAC registry Patients with acute myocardial infarction Higher in-hospital mortality in CHF patients; thought to be related to use of PAC in sicker patients
[17] 1991 33 (16/17) RCT (PAC versus no PAC) Nonsignificant benefit in favor of not receiving PAC
[43] 1991 297 Prospective, incidence study Medical/surgical ICU 22% local infection and 0.7% bacteremia; factors associated with high-risk catheter-related infection included skin colonization, IJ insertion, catheter placement >3 days and insertion in the OR
[28] 1994 100 (50/50) RCT (supra-normal DO2 versus normal DO2) Severe circulatory shock without response to fluid challenge Increase mortality in treatment group
[29] 1995 762 (252/253/257) RCT (control versus supranormal DO2 versus minimal SvO2) Multicenter, high-risk surgical patients with hemorrhagic, septic ARDS and trauma No difference in mortality, organ dysfunction, or length of stay
[45] 1995 32442 Retrospective chart review OR and ICU 0.03% PA rupture with 70% mortality rate
[39] 1995 630 PAC placements in 118 patients Retrospective analysis Patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage 13% catheter related sepsis, 2% CHF, 1.2% DVT, 1% pneumothorax; no PA rupture
[5] 1996 2016 (1008/1008) Prospective cohort, case matching analysis Critically ill patients Increased mortality, cost of care and length of ICU stay in PAC group
[22] 1997 104 (51/53) RCT (routine PAC versus clinically indicated PAC) Low-risk elective abdominal vascular surgery Routine PAC had no benefit in mortality or morbidity
[21] 1998 120 (60/60) RCT (PAC versus no PAC) Surgical low-risk AAA repair No benefit, possibly with higher intraoperative complications
[6] 2000 10,217 Retrospective database study Nonoperative patients in medical and surgical ICU Direct association of PAC use with admission in surgical ICU, white race, care given by nonintensivist, and having private insurance
[8] 2001 4059 (221/3838) Prospective, observational cohort Elective major noncardiac surgery Increase in cardiac and noncardiac events with PAC
[18] 2003 1994 (997/997) RCT (PAC versus no PAC) High risk, >6-year-old surgical patients No benefit in PAC group, higher PE in catheter group, survival rate favored non-PAC group
[20] 2003 676 (335/341) RCT (PAC versus no PAC) Multicenter; shock and ARDS patients No impact of PAC on mortality or morbidity
[23] 2005 1041 (519/522) RCT (PAC versus no PAC) Multi-center, all adult ICUs No evidence of benefit or hospital mortality, 10% complications but not fatal
[24] 2005 433 (215/218) RCT (PAC versus no PAC) Multicenter, severely symptomatic CHF patients No evidence of benefit or overall mortality, 5% complications but none fatal

AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; CHF, congestive heart failure; CVP, central venous pressure; DO2, oxygen delivery; DVT, deep venous thrombosis; ICU, intensive care unit; IJ, internal jugular; MI, myocardial infarction; OR, operating room; PA, pulmonary artery; PAC, pulmonary artery catheter; PE, pulmonary embolism; RHC, right heart catheterization; RH, right heart; RBBB, right bundle branch block; RCT, randomized clinical trial; SvO2, mixed venous oxygen saturation; TEV, thrombotic endocardial vegetation; VT, ventricular tachycardia.