Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 14;9(Suppl 1):S11. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-9-S1-S11

Table 5.

Results of regression analyses assessing the impact of the intervention on individual level outcome indicators for knowledge and use of supportive supervision among immunization managers.

Mean values from Likert scale Regression results


Outcome indicator, n = 26 observations Treatment group Pre-test Post-test Model* F statistic P-value Partial Eta Squared
1. Perceived knowledge to carry out supportive supervision Intervention 3.55 4.64 GLM repeated measures 5.235 0.034 0.216
Control 4.00 3.86
2. Knowledge on how to do supportive supervision as a barrier Intervention 3.55 1.73 GLM repeated measures 8.868 0.008 0.318
Control 3.86 3.86
3. Availability of resources to supervise immunization providers as a barrier Intervention 4.00 2.73 GLM repeated measures 5.970 0.024 0.239
Control 3.93 3.86
4. Lack of clear format for providing supportive supervision as a barrier Intervention 4.09 2.22 GLM repeated measures 6.173 0.022 0.245
Control 3.71 3.21
5. Lack of recognition of importance of supportive supervision by providers as a barrier Intervention 3.64 1.91 GLM repeated measures 13.573 0.002 0.417
Control 2.93 2.79

*Regression models included: treatment group, age, years of experience in the current job, geographic area, and the interaction term "treatment group*geographic area".