Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 27;119(11):1547–1555. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002879

Table 4.

Results from the random effects meta-analysis in which studies were excluded stepwise with specific exposure assessment descriptors.

Incremental exclusion No. of studies included I2 (%) Meta-α (95% CI) Meta-KL × 100 (95% CI) AIC Studies includeda
None (all 19 studies) 19 64.1 1.47 (1.14, 1.81) 0.13 (0.04, 0.22) 28.2 1–19
Studies with insufficient documentation 11 67.4 1.29 (0.87, 1.71) 0.18 (0.04, 0.33) 30.6 1, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 13, 15, 17–19
Studies with external conversion factors 9 68.5 1.38 (0.89, 1.86) 0.19 (0.03, 0.35) 30.6 1, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 13, 18, 19
Studies with insufficient job histories 5 73.7 1.44 (0.78, 2.10) 0.36 (0.10, 0.61) 26.4 4, 8, 9, 18, 19
Studies with CE ratio ≤ 50 3 84.4 1.32 (0.50, 2.14) 0.56 (0.12, 1.00) 25.0 4, 9, 19
Studies with coverage ≤ 30% 2 88.4 1.42 (0.40, 2.44) 0.55 (0.11, 0.99) 25.3 4, 9
aStudy numbers are given in Table 1.