Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 8;119(11):1665–1670. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103548

Table 3.

Estimated regression coefficients relating BAs to BOT-2 scores in models with and without adjustment for other variables [β (95% CI); n = 299].

Exposure measure FMC MC BC SA TMC
Before adjustment
Asa –1.94 (–3.55, –0.35)** –0.70 (–2.07, 0.66) –1.38 (–2.50, –0.26)** 0.07 (–0.63, 0.78) –3.96 (–7.38, –0.55)*
Mna –2.93 (–7.02, 1.16) –3.61 (–7.07, –0.16)* –0.39 (–3.27, 2.47) –1.37 (–3.16, 0.41) –8.32 (–17.02, 0.39)#
Seb 1.55 (0.40, 2.70)** 1.57 (0.60, 2.55)** 0.15 (–0.66, 0.97) 0.26 (–0.25, 0.77) 3.54 (1.10, 6.00)**
After adjustmentc
Asa –1.68 (–3.19, –0.18)* –0.49 (–1.73, 0.76) –1.61 (–2.70, –0.51)** 0.15 (–0.57, 0.86) –3.63 (–6.72, –0.54)*
Mna 1.62 (–2.53, 5.77) 1.03 (–2.40, 4.47) 2.03 (–0.99, 5.06) –0.66 (–2.64, 1.31) 4.02 (–4.52, 12.56)
Seb 0.79 (–0.41, 1.98) 1.02 (0.04, 1.99)* 0.30 (–0.58, 1.66) 0.09 (–0.48, 0.66) 2.17 (–0.30, 4.63)
aLog transformed. bSquare transformed. cThe adjusted variables were sex, school attendance, head circumference, mother’s intelligence (WASI), plasma ferritin, BMn, BSe, and BPb. R2 values for adjusted models for FMC, MC, BC, SA, and TMC were 0.18, 0.22, 0.12, 0.03, and 0.24, respectively. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, #p = 0.06.