Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 29;343:d7434. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7434

Table 3.

 Other functional outcomes in comparative studies of various bearing surfaces in hip replacements. Figures are mean (SD) scores on each scale

Study Metal on metal Ceramic on ceramic Metal on polyethylene Ceramic on polyethylene
Preoperative Postoperative Preoperative Postoperative Preoperative Postoperative Preoperative Postoperative
Dahlstrand, 2009, Sweden27
 SF-36: PF 32.6 (22.6) 67.2 (26.9)* NA NA 40 (24.5) 77 (19.3)* NA NA
 SF-36: BP 33.3 (19.4) 67.9 (31.7)* NA NA 39.3 (19.2) 76.7 (27.9)* NA NA
Engh, 2009, US28
 WOMAC NA 88 (15) NA NA NA 89 (19) NA NA
 PCS (SF-12) NA 46.2 (11.6)† NA NA NA 51 (9)† NA NA
 MCS (SF-12) NA 56.8 (7)‡ NA NA NA 55 (6)‡ NA NA
MacDonald, 2003, US36
 WOMAC 58.7 (15.3) 17.3 (15.1 ) NA NA 59.1 (14.5) 19.9 (18.9) NA NA
 PCS SF-12 32.8 (10.2) 47.2 (9.6) NA NA 31.1 (4.7) 45.5 (11.7) NA NA
 MCS SF-12 53.5 (9.6) 55.9 (6.2) NA NA 53.6 (11.6) 53.3 (11.7) NA NA
Zijlstra, 2009, Netherlands29
 Oxford hip score 40 (8)
19 (8) NA NA 40 (8) 18 (8) NA NA
Lewis, 2010, Canada39
 St Michael’s score NA NA 15.8 22.9 NA NA 16.2 22.8
Grubl, 2006, Austria24
 UCLA activity score NA 7/10 points§ NA 7/10 points§ NA NA NA NA

UCLA=University of California, Los Angeles; PF=physical function; BP=bodily pain; PCS=physical component score; MCS=mental component score; WOMAC=Western Ontario and McMaster Universities activity score; NA=not available (not applicable or not provided).

*At 24 months.

†Difference significant (P=0.03). Mean score for metal on metal calculated from two groups (28 mm and 36 mm head sizes).

‡Difference not significant. Mean score for metal on metal calculated from two groups (28 mm and 36 mm head sizes).

§At 12 months.