Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Stat Assoc. 2011 Sep 1;106(495):846–857. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2011.ap10657

Table 1.

Comparison of adjusted p-values for 1000 correlated comparisons

Na p PERMb GPASSc pACT RAT SLIDE
500 3.15e–4 1.22e–1 1.32e–1 (1.08) 1.12e–1 (0.92) 1.40e–1 (1.15) 1.35e–1 (1.11)
3.20e–5 1.53e–2 1.52e–2 (0.99) 1.32e–2 (0.86) 1.13e–2 (0.74) 1.49e–2 (0.97)
4.85e–6 2.28e–3 2.37e–3 (1.04) 1.94e–3 (0.85) 1.82e–3 (0.80) 2.81e–3 (1.23)
5000 5.45e–4 2.31e–1 2.51e–1 (1.09) 1.93e–1 (0.84) 3.69e–2 (0.16) 2.18e–1 (0.94)
1.80e–5 1.03e–2 1.10e–2 (1.07) 1.26e–2 (1.22) 1.90e–3 (0.18) 1.00e–2 (0.97)
1.00e–6 6.30e–4* 5.75e–4 (0.91) 4.74e–4 (0.75) 7.99e–5 (0.13) 5.70e–4 (0.90)
a

Total number of individuals, including equal number of cases and controls.

b

Permutation p-values based on 50,000 independent permutations (*100,000 permutations).

c

Ratio between adjusted and permutation p-values are shown in parenthesis.