Table 4.
Investigators | Year | n | Study design | Stent type | AVF or AVG | Primary patency (%) | (months) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 M | 6 M | 12 M | |||||||
Vogel and Parise [12] | 2004 | 53 | Retrospective | SMART | AVG | 77 (61–93) | 51 (34–67) | 20 (12–27) | mean 8.9 |
Vogel and Parise [14] | 2005 | 25 | Prospective, Non-randomized | SMART | AVG | 88 (75–100) | 67 (48–86) | 41 (21–61) | mean 8.2 |
Pan et al. [21] | 2005 | 12 | Retrospective | Wallstent, Jostent | AVF | 92 ± 8 | 81 ± 12 | 31 ± 17 | n/a |
Liang et al. [22] | 2006 | 23 | Observational | Wallstent, nitinol | AVG | 69 ± 9 | 41 ± 10 | 30 ± 10 | n/a |
Maya and Allon [23] | 2006 | 14 | Prospective, Non-randomized | Wallstent, SMART, Protégé, Fluency | AVG | 48 | 19 | n/a | median 2.8 |
Chan, M.R. et al. [24] | 2008 | 211 | Retrospective | SMART | AVG | 69 | 25 | n/a | median 4.4 |
Current study | 2011 | 50 | Prospective, Observational | SMART | Both | 79 ± 9 | 51 ± 15 | 27 ± 16 | median 3.8 |
25 | AVF | 80 ± 10 | 65 ± 16 | 32 ± 21 | median 5.2 | ||||
25 | AVG | 76 ± 15 | 28 ± 22 | 19 ± 17 | median 2.9 |