Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cell Biochem. 2009 Nov 1;108(4):802–815. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22292

TABLE I.

Potential MUC1 γ-Secretase Cleavage Sites

γ-secretase cleavage sitea
Substrate P10-P1 P1′-PX′b
SDC3 VVGALFAAFL VTLLIYRMKKK
NGFR VYCSILAAVV VGLVAYIAFKR
CD44 ALALILAVCI AVNSRRR
CDH1 ILILLLLLFL RRR
APP VIATVIVITL VMLKKK
APLP2 AIATVIVISL VMLRKR
APLP1 GGGSLIVLSL LLLRKKK
NOTCH1 FVLLFFVGCG VLLSRKRRR
MUC1c
  I IALLVLVCVL VALAIVYLIA
  II LVCVLVALAI VYLIALAVCQ
  III LAIVYLIALA VCQCRRKNYG
a

Sequences of substrates other than MUC1 are from references [Gu et al., 2001; Kopan and Ilagan, 2004]. Cleavage sites between P1 and P1′ are MEROPS style [Rawlings et al., 2008].

b

P1′–PX′ indicates cleavage site with C-terminal sequence arbitrarily included up to the nearest cluster of positively charged amino acids. In the case of the MUC1 sequences (I–III) 10 amino acids have been included.

c

These products are expected based on the preference for γ-secretase cleavage (39,52) and would generate CTD fragments (top to bottom) of 85 amino acids (9,222 MW), 80 amino acids (8,755 MW), and 73 amino acids(8,010 MW). The MW represent unmodified, average mass calculated in ExPASY program based on the 72 amino acid MUC1 cytoplasmic tail plus the portion of the sequence up to the predicted cleavage site.