Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 1;7(12):e1002289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002289

Figure 4. The impact of a vaccine will be greater if the rate at which immune escape mutants revert in HLA mismatched hosts is faster.

Figure 4

This figure explores how the rate at which immune escape mutants revert in HLA mismatched hosts affects the impact of a five-epitope vaccine delivered to the population 50 years into an epidemic. Model simulations are presented for different reversion rates: rapid reversion (circles; Inline graphic years−1 for i = 1∶5), slow reversion (triangles; Inline graphic years−1 for i = 1∶5) and no reversion (squares; Inline graphic years−1 for i = 1∶5) at each epitope in both vaccinated and unvaccinated hosts. Escape takes an average of 8 years at each epitope in both vaccinated an unvaccinated hosts (Inline graphic years−1 for i = 1∶5). A) shows the proportion of hosts with uncontrolled HIV. B) shows the proportion of hosts infected with HIV. C) shows the escape prevalence amongst HLA-matched hosts. The impact of vaccination (red lines) is compared to the scenario where vaccination is absent (black lines). This figure shows that the prevalence of escape amongst HLA-matched hosts at each epitope would be lower (C) and the vaccine would be more effective in reducing the prevalence of uncontrolled HIV (A) and HIV infection (B) if immune escape mutants revert more rapidly in HLA mismatched hosts. The assumptions and parameters used in these figures are the same as those described for Figure 2 except that the infectiousness and life expectancy of successfully vaccinated hosts are fixed at Inline graphic and Inline graphic, respectively (Inline graphic).