Table 2. Time course of DNA migration pattern for 60 ns, 2.5 MV/m nsPEF exposed and sham-exposed Jurkat cells.
Experiment | % DNAin the tail | Taillength | TailMoment | ||||
Post pulse time (min) | Sham | Exp | Sham | Exp | Sham | Exp | |
1 | 0 | 17 | 13* | 32 | 30* | 7 | 5* |
20 | 16 | 10* | 27 | 24* | 5 | 3* | |
60 | 17 | 16 | 29 | 28 | 4 | 4 | |
2 | 0 | 13 | 7* | 30 | 22* | 5 | 3* |
20 | 8 | 6* | 25 | 19* | 3 | 2* | |
60 | 11 | 13 | 40 | 40 | 6 | 6 |
Results are presented as 75th percentile of the distributions.
*P<0.01 (one sided Kolmogorov-Smirnov test; sham vs exposed samples).