Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 19;20(12):2166–2173. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1911-6

Table 2.

Participant characteristics of the Danish and the English validation samples

Danish validation sample (n = 311) English validation sample (n = 500) Tests for differences between the cohorts
Female 185 (59.5%) 293 (59%) p = 0.8912*
Age, mean (±SD years) 51.4 (15.7) 45 (9.7) p = 0.0001^
STarT group, proportions
 Low 39.8% 47% p = 0.788#
 Medium 34.0% 38%
 High 26.2% 15%
Pain intensity (scale 0–30)
 Back, mean (±SD) 17.9 (7.2) Not comparable p < 0.0000*
 Leg, mean (±SD) 12.9 (9.5) Not comparable
 Numbers with leg pain 239 (76.8%) 303 (61%)
RMDQ (scale 0–100§)
 Mean (±SD) 56.6 (24.1) 39.6 (25.6) p = 0.0343^
Widespread pain neck/shoulders, n (%) 98 (31.5%) 276 (55%) p = 0.0002^
TSK (scale 17–68§)
 Mean (±SD) 37.5 (8.5) 39.5 (6.9) p = 0.0003^
CSQ (scale 0–36§)
 Mean (±SD) 12.9 (7.9) 10 (7.9) p = 0.0001^
HADS anxiety (scale 0–20§)
 Mean (±SD) 6.7 (4.4) 8.2 (4.5) p = 0.0001^
HADS depression (scale 0–20§)
 Mean (±SD) 4.2 (4.0) 6.7 (4.3) p = 0.0001^

RMDQ Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, TSK Tampa Scale of Kinesophobia, CSQ Coping Strategy Questionnaire (catastrophisation domain), HADS (A) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (anxiety subscale), HADS (D) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (depression subscale)

* Z test of proportions

^Unpaired t test

#Kruskal–Wallis test

§High scores are worse