Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct;164(4):1162–1194. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01386.x

Table 2.

Comparison of the effects of various subchronic PCP administration protocols on cognitive paradigms in rats and mice as indicated

Dose Species/Strain/Sex Time of test Behavioural test Antipsychotic drug effect Reference
Subchronic (2 mg·kg−1) Rat/Lister hooded/♀ >7 days Deficit in reversal learning Reversed by acute ASN, CLZ, OLZ, SRT, ZPD and repeated ASN, RSP and OLZ; no effect of acute HLP or CPM (Abdul-Monim et al., 2006; Idris et al., 2010; McLean et al., 2010b)
7 days Deficit in novel object recognition Reversed by acute CLZ, MLP, OLZ, RSP, SRT, but not HLP (Grayson et al., 2007; Idris et al., 2010; Snigdha et al., 2010)
Subchronic (2 mg·kg−1) Rat/Sprague-Dawley/♂ 7 days Deficit in reversal learning (Jentsch and Taylor, 2001)
Deficit in novel object recognition No effect of concurrent RSP (McKibben et al., 2010)
Subchronic (4.5 mg·kg−1) Rat/Sprague-Dawley/♂ 7 days Deficit in performance in double Y-maze (Beninger et al., 2010)
Subchronic (5 mg·kg−1) Rat/Lister hooded/♂ 7 days Deficit in episodic memory No effect of CLZ (Le Cozannet et al., 2010)
Deficit in attentional set shifting Reversed by acute SRT, but not RSP or HLP (Rodefer et al., 2005; Broberg et al., 2009; Goetghebeur and Dias, 2009)
Rat/Wistar/♂ 72 h Deficit in delayed alternation task (Seillier and Giuffrida, 2009)
Mice/C57BL/6J/♂ 7 days No deficit in operant behaviour or reversal learning (Brigman et al., 2009)
Chronic intermittent (2.6 mg·kg−1, 28 days) Rat/Long-Evans/♂ 72 h Impaired attentional set shifting (Egerton et al., 2008)
24 h Deficit in novel object recognition (Spano et al., 2010)
3 days per week for 5 weeks (3 mg·kg−1) Rat/Sprague-Dawley/♂ 4 weeks No effect on attentional set shifting (Fletcher et al., 2005)
Osmotic minipump (15 mg·kg−1·day−1, 14 days) Rat/Lister hooded/♂ 7 days Impaired attentional set shifting (Pedersen et al., 2009)
12 days (0.5–4 mg·kg−1) Mice/C57Bl/6J/♂ 15 min Impaired spatial learning at low dose Reversed by repeated CLZ, but not HLP (Beraki et al., 2008)
14 days (10 mg·kg−1) Rat/Sprague-Dawley and Long-Evans/♂ 48 h Deficit in spatial delay alternation task (at longer delays) (Jentsch et al., 1997b) (Marquis et al., 2007)
Mice/ICR/♂ 5 days Deficit in novel object recognition Reversed by acute and repeated ARP, but not HLP (Nagai et al., 2009)
Mice/C57BL/6J and Rat/Sprague-Dawley/♂ 7 days No deficit in spatial performance (Li et al., 2003)
10 days (with 2 day break) (10 mg·kg−1) Mice/ICR/♂ 14 days Deficit in novel object recognition Reversed by repeated QTP (Tanibuchi et al., 2009)
6 days (1.3 mg·kg−1) Rat/Wistar/♂ 30 min Deficit in spatial learning and memory Reversed by acute CLZ, SRT and RSP; no effect of HLP (Didriksen et al., 2007)
5 days (b.i.d. 5 mg·kg−1) Rat/Sprague-Dawley/♂ 9 days No deficit in spatial delay alternation task (short delays) (Stefani and Moghaddam, 2002)
5 days (2 mg·kg−1) Rat/Wistar/♂ 30 min Deficit in attention, cognitive flexibility and speed of processing Partially attenuated by chronic CLZ, but not QTP (Amitai et al., 2007; Amitai and Markou, 2009b)

Time of test indicates duration after the last PCP injection that the task was evaluated. Subchronic: PCP twice daily for 7 days, chronic intermittent: PCP once daily for 5 days followed by three times a week for 3 weeks.

Abbreviations: ARP, aripirazole; ASN, asenapine; CLZ, clozapine; CPM, chlorpromazine; HLP, haloperidol; MLP, melparone; OLZ, olanzapine; QTP, quetiapine; RSP, risperidone; SRT, sertindole; ZPD, ziprasidone. Note: As no current antipsychotic drugs reverse cognitive deficits seen in schizophrenia, the translational relevance of these observations in rodents is currently difficult to evaluate, only in future if cognitive enhancers are developed will the true predictive value of these tasks become apparent.