Table 3.
Follow-up | 3 months | 12 months | 2 years | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n (response rate) | 598 (95%) | 574 (91%) | 629 (99%) a | |||
EQ-5D score b | 0.45 (0.41–0.48) | < 0.001 | 0.46 (0.43–0.50) | < 0.001 | 0.46 (0.43–0.49) | < 0.001 |
Health state b | 29 (27–31) | < 0.001 | 31 (29–34) | < 0.001 | 30 (28–32) | < 0.001 |
Leg pain b | 43 (41–46) | < 0.001 | 41 (38–44) | < 0.001 | 41 (38–44) | < 0.001 |
Back pain b | 29 (27–31) | < 0.001 | 28 (25–31) | < 0.001 | 27 (24–30) | < 0.001 |
Benefited from the operation, n (%) c | 539 (90) | 527 (92) | 571 (91) | |||
Received worker's compensation, n (%) d | 335 (57) | 166 (31) | 181 (29) |
a Includes non-respondents interviewed by telephone.
b Absolute values (improvements from baseline) are shown as mean change, (95% CI) and p-value
c Patients who stated that they had “some”, “much”, or “very much” benefit from the operation.
d Patients who were on full or partial sick leave, on rehabilitation, or disability pensioners.