Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 5.
Published in final edited form as: Int J STD AIDS. 2011 Oct;22(10):558–567. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2011.010322

Table 2.

Model calibration parameters and measures.

Swaziland Tanzania Uganda Zambia
Calibration Parameter
HIV monthly transmission probabilities (per partnership)
    Acute phase 0.34 0.18 0.25 0.25
    Chronic phase 0.029 0.015 0.021 0.022
    With treatment 0.0041 0.0022 0.0030 0.0031

Calibration Measures
Change in HIV Prevalence (%)
    Data, 2004–2007 [1] −0.4% −0.3% −0.9% 0.1%
    (low and high estimates indicated) (−2.5%, 1.7%) (−1.0%, 0.5%) (−2.1%, −0.1%) (−2.1%, 2.2%)
    Model prediction, 2004–2007 −0.9% −0.1% −0.2% −1.0%
    (95% confidence intervals) (−1.8%, −0.2%) (−0.7%, 0.4%) (−0.7%, 0.2%) (−1.6%, −0.3%)
Number of partners
    Data [3639]
     Married (%) 33% 52% 58% 58%
     (95% confidence intervals) (32%, 34%) (51%, 53%) (57%, 59%) (56%, 60%)
     More than 1 concurrent partner 14% 20% 20% 20%
     (95% confidence intervals) (13%, 15%) (19%, 21%) (19%, 21%) (18%, 22%)
    Model prediction
     Married (%) 31% 52% 58% 57%
     (95% confidence intervals) (30%, 32%) (51%, 53%) (58%, 59%) (57%, 58%)
     More than 1 concurrent partner 13% 20% 21% 19%
     (95% confidence intervals) (12%, 13%) (19%, 20%) (20%, 21%) (19%, 20%)
*

The monthly probabilities of HIV transmission were adjusted to match country-specific HIV prevalence trends. Other measures, such as number of married and unmarried partners, are also well-matched.