Table 2.
Swaziland | Tanzania | Uganda | Zambia | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Calibration Parameter | ||||
HIV monthly transmission probabilities (per partnership) | ||||
Acute phase | 0.34 | 0.18 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
Chronic phase | 0.029 | 0.015 | 0.021 | 0.022 |
With treatment | 0.0041 | 0.0022 | 0.0030 | 0.0031 |
Calibration Measures | ||||
Change in HIV Prevalence (%) | ||||
Data, 2004–2007 [1] | −0.4% | −0.3% | −0.9% | 0.1% |
(low and high estimates indicated) | (−2.5%, 1.7%) | (−1.0%, 0.5%) | (−2.1%, −0.1%) | (−2.1%, 2.2%) |
Model prediction, 2004–2007 | −0.9% | −0.1% | −0.2% | −1.0% |
(95% confidence intervals) | (−1.8%, −0.2%) | (−0.7%, 0.4%) | (−0.7%, 0.2%) | (−1.6%, −0.3%) |
Number of partners | ||||
Data [36–39] | ||||
Married (%) | 33% | 52% | 58% | 58% |
(95% confidence intervals) | (32%, 34%) | (51%, 53%) | (57%, 59%) | (56%, 60%) |
More than 1 concurrent partner | 14% | 20% | 20% | 20% |
(95% confidence intervals) | (13%, 15%) | (19%, 21%) | (19%, 21%) | (18%, 22%) |
Model prediction | ||||
Married (%) | 31% | 52% | 58% | 57% |
(95% confidence intervals) | (30%, 32%) | (51%, 53%) | (58%, 59%) | (57%, 58%) |
More than 1 concurrent partner | 13% | 20% | 21% | 19% |
(95% confidence intervals) | (12%, 13%) | (19%, 20%) | (20%, 21%) | (19%, 20%) |
The monthly probabilities of HIV transmission were adjusted to match country-specific HIV prevalence trends. Other measures, such as number of married and unmarried partners, are also well-matched.