Skip to main content
. 2011 May 1;6(5):623–629. doi: 10.4161/epi.6.5.15335

Table 2.

Simple and multivariate linear regression of LINE-1 methylation (%) and body composition in the North Texas Healthy Heart study, 2008a

Simple linear regression (model 1) Multivariate linear regression (model 2) Multivariate linear regression (model 3) Multivariate linear regression (model 4)
β (95% CI) β (95% CI)b β (95% CI)c β (95% CI)d
Body mass index (kg/m2) −0.12 (−0.58, 0.39) −0.05 (−0.50, 0.40) 0.05 (−0.40, 0.49) 0.06 (−0.37, 0.50)
Waist circumference (cm) −0.11 (−0.57, 0.35) −0.04 (−0.49, 0.41) −0.22 (−0.66, 0.22) −0.20 (−0.64, 0.24)
Total adipose tissue (cm2) −0.45 (−0.94, 0.05) −0.37 (−0.87, 0.12) −0.17 (−0.66, 0.31) −0.16 (−0.65, 0.32)
Subcutaneous fat (cm2) −0.65 (−1.14, −0.16) −0.49 (−0.99, 0.01) −0.23 (−0.75, 0.28) −0.13 (−0.65, 0.38)
Visceral fat (cm2) 0.20 (−0.30, 0.70) 0.06 (−0.47, 0.58) −0.02 (−0.50, 0.46) −0.19 (−0.70, 0.31)
SAT/VAT ratioe −0.70 (−1.19, −0.21) −0.51 (−1.03, 0.01) −0.19 (−0.74, 0.36) 0.09 (−0.50, 0.68)
Percent fat mass (%) −0.57 (−1.03, −0.11) −0.50 (−0.98, −0.03) 0.11 (−0.50, 0.69) 0.11 (−0.48, 0.70)
Percent fat-free mass (%) 0.57 (0.11, 1.03) 0.50 (0.03, 0.98) −0.11 (−0.69, 0.48) −0.11 (−0.70, 0.49)
FM/FFM ratioe −0.54 (−1.00, −0.08) −0.48 (−0.95, 0.003) 0.15 (−0.43, 0.73) 0.13 (−0.45, 0.72)
a

Body composition measures were standardized to mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1.

b

Adjusted for age and race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black and Hispanic).

c

Adjusted for age and gender.

d

Adjusted for age, gender and race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black and Hispanic).

e

SAT/VAT ratio is defined as the ratio of area of subcutaneous adipose tissue (cm2) to the area of visceral adipose tissue (cm2) at the L4-L5 interspaces; FM/FFM ratio is defined as the ratio of fat mass (%FM) to fat-free mass (%FFM).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure