Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 5;6(12):e28030. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028030

Table 1. Summary of in vitro and in vivo CEACAM expression of all cell lines by different methods.

cell culture xenografted tumor
QPCR WB FACS positive immunocytochemistry immunohistochemistry
5061 +++ + 99% +++ (95%) ++/+++ (45%)
5072 ++ + 77% +++ (90%) − (0%)
LNCAP ++ + 93% ++ (100%) ++/+++ (60%)
PC3 + + 23% ++ (10%) (+) (20%)
T47D + (+) 5% + (1%) +/++ (20%)
MCF7 + + 23% +++ (5%) +/++ (20%)
MEWO (+) + 74% +++ (85%) ++ (60%)
FemX-1 + + 95% +++ (100%) ++/+++ (90%)
HT29 ++ + 86% +++ (90%) ++ (45%)
Caco2 + + 16% +++ (90%) ++ (20%)
SW480 + 31% + (5%) (+) (30%)
OH-1 (+) + 80% ++ (80%) (+) (100%)

Note that the highest CEACAM expression in vitro and in vivo showed the melanoma cell line FemX-1. The intensity (plus signs) and extent (percent) of the positive areas of 5 histological sections were determined by visual inspection of 3 independent observers.