Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 5;11(9):8626–8642. doi: 10.3390/s110908626

Table A1.

Accuracy rate results of different classification approaches for flat skin cover.

Classifiers Training Accuracy Validation Accuracy
Naïve Bayes 81.72% 80%
Neural Network (MLP) na = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 5 n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 5
33.3% 30% 63.3% 30% 30% 25.6% 53.3% 26.7%
SVM with Linear Kernel Cb = 0.3 C = 1 C = 5 C = 10 C = 100 C = 0.3 C = 1 C = 5 C = 10 C = 100
88.3% 90.8% 93.3% 94.2% 97.5% 78.33% 80.83% 84.2% 81.7% 85%
SVM with Polynomial Kernel C = 0.3 C = 1 C = 5 C = 10 C = 100 C = 0.3 C = 1 C = 5 C = 10 C = 100
pc = 2 72.5% 79.2% 86.7% 90% 94.2% 52.5% 65% 77.5% 77.5% 81.7%
p = 3 62.5% 71.7% 82.5% 85% 92.5% 41.7% 46.7% 67.5% 68.3% 81.7%
p = 4 50% 61.7% 72.5% 78.3% 88.3% 37.5% 47.5% 50% 57.5% 74.2%
p = 5 43.3% 53.3% 69.2% 71.7% 85.8% 34.2% 42.5% 46.7% 46.7% 61.7%
SVM with RBF Kernel C = 0.3 C = 1 C = 5 C = 10 C = 100 C = 0.3 C = 1 C = 5 C = 10 C = 100
γd = 0.1 81.7% 86.7% 91.7% 92.5% 98.3% 78.3% 75% 84.2% 83.3% 88.3%
γ = 0.3 85.8% 92.5% 94.2% 95.8% 98.3% 77.5% 80.8% 85% 85.8% 90%
γ = 0.5 90% 92.5% 95.8% 97.5% 99.2% 79.2% 84.2% 83.3% 86.7% 90%
a

n shows the number of neurons in the hidden layer of a Multi-Layer Perceptron

b

C represents the upper bound parameter of the SVM soft margin

c

p is the degree of the Polynomial kernel

d

γ shows the parameter of SVM Radial Basis Function kernel