Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 18;11(7):7243–7261. doi: 10.3390/s110707243

Table 2.

Estimated ROPs between camera “0” (AVT-0) and the other cameras.

Procedure Camera Δω (deg ± s) Δϕ (deg ± s) Δκ (deg ± s) ΔX (m ± m) ΔY (m ± m) ΔZ (m ± m)
Two-step Indirect Camera “1” (AVT-1) 0.92777 ±285.5 −0.38012 ±100.1 −2.00209 ±85.2 −0.03 ±0.01 −1.47 ±0.01 0.06 ±0.01
Camera “2” (Basler-2) −41.65608 ±144.7 −0.05911 ±140.8 −1.05843 ±198.3 −0.02 ±0.01 −1.49 ±0.01 0.62 ±0.01
Camera “3” (Basler-3) −88.95329 ±235.1 1.98176 ±237.6 −0.69070 ±200.0 −0.04 ±0.01 −1.48 ±0.02 1.71 ±0.02
Camera “4” (Basler-4) −128.10177 ±321.9 0.52740 ±130.3 −0.33972 ±85.9 −0.06 ±0.01 −1.48 ±0.01 2.47 ±0.01

Single-Step Indirect Geo-ref. with ROC Camera “1” (AVT-1) 0.93444 ±14.6 −0.40842 ±17.1 −2.00061 ±20.0 −0.03 ±0.0013 −1.48 ±0.0019 0.06 ±0.0014
Camera “2” (Basler-2) −41.66469 ±17.5 −0.09493 ±23.3 −1.06639 ±31.4 −0.03 ±0.0017 −1.50 ±0.0022 0.63 ±0.0024
Camera “3” (Basler-3) −88.91613 ±25.0 1.95771 ±43.2 −0.69984 ±36.8 −0.04 ±0.0021 −1.49 ±0.0026 1.72 ±0.0031
Camera “4” (Basler-4) −128.10779 ±25.1 0.54875 ±52.1 −0.32753 ±38.0 −0.05 ±0.0021 −1.48 ±0.0028 2.47 ±0.0035